Which of the following best describes an easement that is granted for a specific use which benefits a particular property?

An appurtenant easement is an easement that is specifically granted for a particular use and is tied to a specific piece of property, benefiting that property. This means that the easement benefits one parcel of land (the dominant estate) while burdening another parcel (the servient estate). The key aspect of appurtenant easements is that they pass with the ownership of the land, meaning if the property is sold, the easement remains in effect for the new owner.

In contrast, an easement by prescription is acquired through continuous and uninterrupted use of someone else's property without permission, often over a statutory period. Exclusive easements refer to rights that prevent the property owner from using their land in certain ways, which isn't the same as providing specific benefits to a property. A naked easement, on the other hand, provides a right of usage without any benefit to the land and lacks consideration, thereby not serving a specific use related to the dominion property.

Therefore, since the question focuses on an easement that benefits a particular property for a specific use, describing it as an appurtenant easement accurately captures its importance and function in property law.